Mr. Pena’s response to our open letters
March 4, 2005I just got a hold of Mr. Pena’s response to our 2 open letters.
I must say, I’m a bit disappointed that Mr. Pena is now trying to distance himself from his CICT guidelines. Obviously it’s become quite a mess and I guess he doesn’t want to be associated with this mess. My brother JJ does a good job here of explaining how the Guidelines are Mr. Pena’s creation, and that he shouldn’t try to duck responsibility for the Guidelines.
What I instead want to point out is Mar Roxas statement last week about the CICT not being accountable:
I’ll quote:
“What kind of an animal is CICT? It’s not accountable for the e-government fund. So it was a basic management decision to re-align the [P1 Billion Peso] fund back to the government agencies.”
Mr. Pena, don’t you think this would be a good opportunity to show Mr. Roxas that you’re willing to be accountable for your actions? No one expects you to be perfect. We’ve pointed out the serious outages on EDU.PH and GOV.PH servers. Shouldn’t you ask your System Administrators to explain what is going on? We would be more than happy to work with you to resolve these problems, and to suggest ways to fix these problems. After all, the Gov.PH system is your repsonsibility, and it does affect all of us!
And since you seem to be under the impression that either the Gov.ph or Edu.ph registries are technically capable of taking over DotPH’s responsibilities, isn’t it time that you re-examine your reasons for wanting to shut down DotPH? What is the point in Government running the PH Domain if it is just going to result in the kinds of massive outages we seen with edu.ph and gov.ph?
Perhaps, at last, you can just ask your Domain Advisory Board to come up with a list of problems that they’ve seen with DotPH? (Surely they must see some problems with our operation, or else they would not ask you to shut us down!) Then we can all talk about ways to fix these problems in a cooperative problem-solving fashion, and hopefully we can all move on with our lives.
I sincerely hope you think about this carefully.
Previous Comments
Hello! Any info regarding the year 2005 outages?
Posted by Manuel at March 9, 2005, 2:26 pmPerhaps the thomas heart already, also thomas sabo perhaps is old be load. You continue thomas sabo charm in the park, the thomas sabo charms trails carefree seemingly thomas sabo wholesale aimless, is thomas sabo sale a very meaningful thomas sabo uk journey. The thomas sabo watches spring wind is thomas sabo reviews to meet the thomas sabos aroma, also thomas sabo store to blow the thomas sabo shop lakes and weeping cheap thomas sabo chains whisper. Links London cheap thomas sabo watches Rings are cheap thomas sabo pendants very suitable cheap thomas sabo necklaces for you to cheap thomas sabo rings wear in that city cheap thomas sabo earrings and then you cheap thomas sabo bangles will be very cheap thomas sabo braceletshappy to see them cheap thomas sabo charms in your home.
Posted by hanlongyue at December 18, 2010, 3:38 pm








I think the government or the CICT is not capable of handling the dotPH basing on their current ability (or inability) to keep the .gov.ph and .edu.ph on constant uptime.
The goverment websites that i’ve visited are so slow to load. The slowness is a reflection of the goverment’s true movement in running my beloved country.
I love God, and i love this country. I hate selfish politics.
Posted by Jeffrey at March 8, 2005, 11:06 am